Actual vacation homes within WDW property?
in [Disney Parks]
|
From: Rob Steere on 24 Jun 2010 23:09 "Glo in Miami" <ggkons(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:hvub57$4b8$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > It is my understanding that Disney sold off this property for development > and it is no longer a part of the Reedy Creek district. So, the full-time > residents still wouldn't get to vote on Reedy Creek issues. > > Gloria in PA > That is correct. The land was de-annexed from RCID, so the residents will not have a vote within the District. Also, there are residents in both the cities of Bay Lake and Lake Buena Vista. The Bay Lake residents reside on Bay Court of of Reams Road just north of Bay Lake itself. Residents of Lake Buena Vista live on Royal Oak Court off of Buena Vista Drive, north of Saratoga Springs. You can find both of these "neighborhoods" on Google Maps. -Rob
From: Judy on 25 Jun 2010 08:43 On Jun 24, 9:55 pm, Ginny Favers <ginnyfav...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/24/2010 4:22 PM, Rudeney wrote:> Ginny Favers wrote: > > >> You can buy a really nice foreclosure and fix it up, right behind Bay > >> Lake, for about $250K cash right now. > > >> Not on Disney property, but then you'd own your land and have less > >> ****sh** covenants and restrictions to deal with, nevermind the extra > >> fees that must be involved. > > > I'll bet those houses are still in neighborhoods that have covenants. > > Almost anything built in the last 15 years will be a planned development > > with covenants. In fact, many cities now have laws on the books that > > require new developments with more than so many house to have covenants > > and an HOA. > > Covenants in your average middle class subdivision vs. the ones that > will exist at Golden Oaks -- I don't think there is a comparison. What > kind of Christmas lights you can have, forbidding you to park your car > in your own driveway, rules about what you can and can't put on your > porch, what color your house can be... I can only imagine. > > ~Amanda There is a middle class subdivision in my town that restricts the color of Chritsmas lights that you can use. Many neighborhoods in my own and surrounding towns do the same thing. Judy
From: Rudeney on 25 Jun 2010 14:17 Judy wrote: > On Jun 24, 9:55 pm, Ginny Favers <ginnyfav...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 6/24/2010 4:22 PM, Rudeney wrote:> Ginny Favers wrote: >> >>>> You can buy a really nice foreclosure and fix it up, right behind Bay >>>> Lake, for about $250K cash right now. >>>> Not on Disney property, but then you'd own your land and have less >>>> ****sh** covenants and restrictions to deal with, nevermind the extra >>>> fees that must be involved. >>> I'll bet those houses are still in neighborhoods that have covenants. >>> Almost anything built in the last 15 years will be a planned development >>> with covenants. In fact, many cities now have laws on the books that >>> require new developments with more than so many house to have covenants >>> and an HOA. >> Covenants in your average middle class subdivision vs. the ones that >> will exist at Golden Oaks -- I don't think there is a comparison. What >> kind of Christmas lights you can have, forbidding you to park your car >> in your own driveway, rules about what you can and can't put on your >> porch, what color your house can be... I can only imagine. >> >> ~Amanda > > There is a middle class subdivision in my town that restricts the > color of Chritsmas lights that you can use. Many neighborhoods in my > own and surrounding towns do the same thing. Yep, we used to live in a development that is now almost 30 years old and it has strict covenants. They restrict house color, foliage, etc. They even require the first ten feet of yard from the street to be grass, with small exceptions for flowers and borders around mailboxes. I guess we've nearly always lived in a covenant-restricted community and have just gotten used to it. Most of the rules make sense and we enjoy knowing that our neighbors aren't able to anything "weird". -- - RODNEY Next WDW Vacation? Who knows! Need to know more about RADP (rec.arts.disney.parks)? http://www.radp.org http://allears.net/btp/radp_bk.htm http://allears.net/tp/abrev.htm Are you still accessing RADP via Google? Why? Get instructions on how to access to the "real" RADP Usenet Group here: http://meets.radp.org/usenet.htm
From: JackM on 25 Jun 2010 18:48 Caren wrote: > > RADP has NEVER had an axe murderer. Pyromaniacs, kleptomaniacs, and > megalomaniacs: yes; axe murders: no. RADP Pyromaniacs, kleptomaniacs, and megalomaniacs...... <Jeopardy think music plays> Who is Ping? ;-) Jack -- My email address on the header is a non-monitored spam catching account. I can be reached via http://www.wvnh.net/contact.htm The dates for the next RADP Meet are December 10-13, 2010 for RADP-XV (http://meets.radp.org).
From: John Mc on 25 Jun 2010 19:26
Caren wrote: > On Jun 24, 12:43 pm, Peppermint Patty <patriciabarbe...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: >>> We did something similar at the beach. Right after, they changed the >>> rules so that subsequent sales may not be owned by a corporation, trust >>> or group of more than three people. I'd assume they'd have similar >>> provisions to keep out the riff-raff. >> Hey, are you insinuating that RADP members are riff-raff? I know we >> have axe murderers but come on - riff raff??? Surely you jest. > > RADP has NEVER had an axe murderer. Pyromaniacs, kleptomaniacs, and > megalomaniacs: yes; axe murders: no. > > -- > Caren > TDC Queen of Adventureland > (For your information, Trader Sam has never owned an axe.) That's right, the DeLIBerator is a sword!! John Mc. |