GOOGLE ME NOW!
in [Las Vegas]
|
From: David Berman on 27 Jul 2007 16:08 SNIPPED >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I agree David with some of your observations. Mikey got a little carried away and used language, which is offensive to many people and should have cooled it. What I disagree with is your "broad brush" approach to people who associate with Mikey. How can you paint EVERYONE who associates with Mikey as being of "low class"? Do you know EVERYONE, who meets with Mikey or works with Mikey? I'm making plans to have lunch with the guy around october 9th or 10th in vegas. As I said before, I reserve my opinion of a person until I have a chance to meet them face to face. Does that make me low class, because I decide to have lunch with him? I might agree with everyone else about Mikey or I may like the guy, but at least please don't use "guilt by association" to define individuals. I'll have lunch with anyone at least once. FARMER JOHN Let me clarify, John. By "associate," I don't mean meeting a person for lunch. The impression you come away with, however, and your consequent decision on whether you want to have an ongoing association with him, might be a different thing. I think when Andrew and I met Mikey, we were hoping he'd be a person who is easy to like. After all, we knew he was an individual who was taking on Chuck, and we thought that was a positive thing. But my opinion started to change after meeting him, and continued to change as I observed his AVLV "personality." I'd be surprised if Andrew felt any differently, but that would be for him to say. --David/NV
From: CLM in ND on 27 Jul 2007 16:09 On Jul 27, 3:05 pm, salmone...(a)aol.com wrote: > > God how I loved Jesus Alou. > > > That swing, jiggle of the arms and neck and especially that spit! > > Another one of Mikey's sexual fantasies he should have kept to himself. I'm glad I wasn't the only one creeped out by that. Cameron
From: Farmer John on 27 Jul 2007 16:11 "Thomas W." <nospam-wollerthomas-no.spam(a)yahoo.de> wrote in message news:7sika3t6h6saqbhtvfhalp2nu27m3dhgr4(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:34:59 GMT, "Farmer John" <john5240(a)verizon.net> > wrote: > > >I agree David with some of your observations. Mikey got a little carried away and used language, which is offensive to many people and should have cooled it. What I disagree with is your "broad brush" approach to people who associate with Mikey. How can you paint EVERYONE who associates with Mikey as being of "low class"? Do you know EVERYONE, who meets with Mikey or works with Mikey? I'm making plans to have lunch with the guy around october 9th or 10th in vegas. As I said before, I reserve my opinion of a person until I have a chance to meet them face to face. Does that make me low class, because I decide to have lunch with him? I might agree with everyone else about Mikey or I may like the guy, but at least please don't use "guilt by association" to define individuals. I'll have lunch with anyone at least once. FARMER JOHN > > As you and trout are the only ones associating here with Mikey, Dave's > assessment is right on the money for avlv. There's still hope for EE. > > Thomas W. Have you ever met mr. Trout? Had a drink with him and talk for awhile? How about me? The answer is NO. The same with EE. Don't judge someone unless you have met them. Regardless of what they say over a PC. FARMER JOHN
From: CyBerHoG® on 27 Jul 2007 16:26 On Jul 27, 3:08 pm, "David Berman" <davidi...(a)cox.net> wrote: > > I think when Andrew and I met Mikey, we were hoping he'd be a person who is easy to like. After all, we knew he was an individual who was taking on Chuck, and we thought that was a positive thing. But my opinion started to change after meeting him, and continued to change as I observed his AVLV "personality." I'd be surprised if Andrew felt any differently, but that would be for him to say. > > --David/NV I think BM thought that that was his ticket to being accepted on this group initially. Side with the majority here and bash Chuck and make a whole lot of new friends. The problem with his plan was that he wound up meeting many of them. Since then, he's not only become the most reviled poster on this group, but he's actually elevated Mr. Kohlenberg's status for many of the long time posters who despised him. No small feat, but one can attribute that to the sheer magnitude of BM's negative personality.
From: Sinatra on 27 Jul 2007 16:32
>Ask about what it means to SELL SHORT. Curious, what did you short sell? |