From: Mr. Travel on
Greg Procter wrote:

> Jeff wrote:
>
>>"Craig Welch" <craig(a)pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
>>news:5k7jm3p9oqljfhauogac946kt3mgg23bts(a)4ax.com...
>>
>>>"Mr. Travel" <mtravel(a)a.a> said:
>>>
>>>
>>>>It is possible to be against a country without being in a war with them.
>>>>
>>>>For example, look at Iran and North Korea.
>>>>We aren't at war with them.
>>>>By your logic, that means we are their friend.
>>>
>>>The US is still at war with North Korea.
>>>
>>
>>Actually, there is no "war" between the U.S. and North Korea. This was a UN
>>action and the armastice (sp??) is between North and South Korea.
>
>
>
> No war between the US and North Korea? All those dead soldiers will be
> pleased to hear that!

There was no war declared by either side in the conflict.
From: Mr. Travel on
Dave Witmarsh wrote:
>
> Every country has some shitty restaurants. In america you *only* have
> shitty restaurants. For people with such over-inflated opinions of
> yourselves you are remakarbly happy to eat crud.

Obviously there is no convincing idiots that make such statements.
From: Lumpy on
On Dec 21, 10:53 pm, Dave Witmarsh <gogo...(a)gogo.not> wrote:

>
> Every  country has some shitty restaurants. In america you *only* have
> shitty restaurants.  For people with such over-inflated opinions of
> yourselves you are remakarbly happy to eat crud.
> HTH

Sad, but true. I have the means to eat anywhere I please. In the last
15 years, I have yet to have a decent meal, other than a few Mexican
owned and operated places in the SW, who haven't succumbed to
AmeriMex, which is processed cheese on top of canned refried beans and
microwaved.

What happened is even "fine" dining restaurants began ordering their
ingredients from large manufacturer/distributors, which guarantees
that 99% of every meal tastes the same. I've had a few outstanding
meals but they were in places where the restaurant was actually in the
business of producing it's own meat, fowl, vegetables and fruit.
From: Greg Procter on
"Mr. Travel" wrote:
>
> Jeff wrote:
> > "Craig Welch" <craig(a)pacific.net.sg> wrote in message
> > news:5k7jm3p9oqljfhauogac946kt3mgg23bts(a)4ax.com...
> >
> >>"Mr. Travel" <mtravel(a)a.a> said:
> >>
> >>
> >>>It is possible to be against a country without being in a war with them.
> >>>
> >>>For example, look at Iran and North Korea.
> >>>We aren't at war with them.
> >>>By your logic, that means we are their friend.
> >>
> >>The US is still at war with North Korea.
> >>
> >
> >
> > Actually, there is no "war" between the U.S. and North Korea. This was a UN
> > action and the armastice (sp??) is between North and South Korea.
>
> As mentioned on M*A*S*H many times, it was a police action.

You were slaughtering Koreans to stop them from reuniting their own
country.
From: Greg Procter on
"Mr. Travel" wrote:
>
> Greg Procter wrote:
>
> > "Mr. Travel" wrote:
> >
> >>Greg Procter wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>"Mr. Travel" wrote:
> >>
> >>>That's somewhat backwards logic, but at the time I was prescribed
> >>>antibiotics I had an infection.
> >>>
> >>>Quote: "> > I had an infection."
> >>
> >>Agreed. You said, "I had an infection." You also said, "I take
> >>prescribed drugs such as the antibiotics suggested by my dentist"
> >>
> >>"I take" is present tense. "I had" is past tense.
> >>So, with no infection now, you are still taking the drugs.
> >
> >
> > In that situation "I take" is a generalization covering my entire adult
> > life.
> >
>
> Is this Kiwi grammar?

It's called 'English grammar'.