Tipping in USA/Canada
in [Airline Travel]
|
From: Mr Travel on 23 Dec 2007 05:44 Greg Procter wrote: > "Mr. Travel" wrote: > >>Jeff wrote: >> >>>"Craig Welch" <craig(a)pacific.net.sg> wrote in message >>>news:5k7jm3p9oqljfhauogac946kt3mgg23bts(a)4ax.com... >>> >>> >>>>"Mr. Travel" <mtravel(a)a.a> said: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>It is possible to be against a country without being in a war with them. >>>>> >>>>>For example, look at Iran and North Korea. >>>>>We aren't at war with them. >>>>>By your logic, that means we are their friend. >>>> >>>>The US is still at war with North Korea. >>>> >>> >>> >>>Actually, there is no "war" between the U.S. and North Korea. This was a UN >>>action and the armastice (sp??) is between North and South Korea. >> >>As mentioned on M*A*S*H many times, it was a police action. > > > You were slaughtering Koreans to stop them from reuniting their own > country. You really don't read much, do you?
From: Mr Travel on 23 Dec 2007 05:46 Greg Procter wrote: > > It's called 'English grammar'. "I take" in English is present tense.
From: Mr Travel on 23 Dec 2007 05:47 Greg Procter wrote: > "Mr. Travel" wrote: > >> >>Are you suggesting England is not beyond N. America? > > > > No, that's your story. You claom the poem never made it outside the US, when it was written in England.
From: Greg Procter on 23 Dec 2007 14:43 Mr Travel wrote: > > Greg Procter wrote: > > "Mr. Travel" wrote: > > >> > >>There was no war declared by either side in the conflict. > > > > > > > > That seems to be an entirely yank concept! (see brainwashing) > > Great, please report the evidence that either side declared war on the > other. You really can't be _that_ stupid??? A B52 load of bombs deliberately dropped on a foreign nation constitutes a declaration of war in anyone's book - unless of course you can convince the recipients that it was an accidental deliberate act. (Huhh???)
From: Greg Procter on 23 Dec 2007 14:52
Mr Travel wrote: > > Greg Procter wrote: > > > "Mr. Travel" wrote: > > > >>Jeff wrote: > >> > >>>"Craig Welch" <craig(a)pacific.net.sg> wrote in message > >>>news:5k7jm3p9oqljfhauogac946kt3mgg23bts(a)4ax.com... > >>> > >>> > >>>>"Mr. Travel" <mtravel(a)a.a> said: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>It is possible to be against a country without being in a war with them. > >>>>> > >>>>>For example, look at Iran and North Korea. > >>>>>We aren't at war with them. > >>>>>By your logic, that means we are their friend. > >>>> > >>>>The US is still at war with North Korea. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>Actually, there is no "war" between the U.S. and North Korea. This was a UN > >>>action and the armastice (sp??) is between North and South Korea. > >> > >>As mentioned on M*A*S*H many times, it was a police action. > > > > > > You were slaughtering Koreans to stop them from reuniting their own > > country. > > You really don't read much, do you? I not only read but I also think about what I read. Are you suggesting the US actions in Korea were _not_ intended to keep Korea divided??? |