From: DevilsPGD on
In message <8aq6a3di9ftgjdh75o9mieksl26hmh710n(a)4ax.com> DaveM
<asma61(a)dsl.pipex.com> wrote:

>I'd also like the unwashed and the talkative/loud-mouthed put somewhere else
>as well, but I can see identifying them in advance wouldn't be practicable.

In general, I'd agree -- However, my flight last night was spent
chatting with an incredibly intelligent young woman, I rather enjoyed
the conversation. *shrugs*

Usually I'm just rude, cut off a topic and put on headphones.

--
If quitters never win, and winners never quit,
what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?
From: Banty on
In article <kli9a3tqcjpih591jmnkoravmk44fldfdh(a)4ax.com>, DevilsPGD says...
>
>In message <8aq6a3di9ftgjdh75o9mieksl26hmh710n(a)4ax.com> DaveM
><asma61(a)dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
>
>>I'd also like the unwashed and the talkative/loud-mouthed put somewhere else
>>as well, but I can see identifying them in advance wouldn't be practicable.
>
>In general, I'd agree -- However, my flight last night was spent
>chatting with an incredibly intelligent young woman, I rather enjoyed
>the conversation. *shrugs*
>
>Usually I'm just rude, cut off a topic and put on headphones.
>

That's not necessarily rude. You can say something like "interesting talking
wiht you; I'd like to read/listen to music/whatever now" and put on your
headphones.

As much as some of the talkative may want to believe otherwise, one is *not*
obliged to converse just because someone else wants to.

Banty

From: DevilsPGD on
In message <f852tv02u4b(a)drn.newsguy.com> Banty
<Banty_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote:

>In article <kli9a3tqcjpih591jmnkoravmk44fldfdh(a)4ax.com>, DevilsPGD says...
>>
>>In message <8aq6a3di9ftgjdh75o9mieksl26hmh710n(a)4ax.com> DaveM
>><asma61(a)dsl.pipex.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I'd also like the unwashed and the talkative/loud-mouthed put somewhere else
>>>as well, but I can see identifying them in advance wouldn't be practicable.
>>
>>In general, I'd agree -- However, my flight last night was spent
>>chatting with an incredibly intelligent young woman, I rather enjoyed
>>the conversation. *shrugs*
>>
>>Usually I'm just rude, cut off a topic and put on headphones.
>>
>
>That's not necessarily rude. You can say something like "interesting talking
>wiht you; I'd like to read/listen to music/whatever now" and put on your
>headphones.

Indeed.

>As much as some of the talkative may want to believe otherwise, one is *not*
>obliged to converse just because someone else wants to.

Agreed -- I've gotten dirty looks, but such is life.

--
If quitters never win, and winners never quit,
what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?
From: ant on
hummingbird wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:13:22 GMT 'Jeff Hacker'
> posted this onto rec.travel.air:

>> Years ago, Eastern Air Lines had a "family" section on their DC8-61's
>> between JFK and San Juan, with that section in the rear portion of
>> the jet. I don't know how it worked out, but it would be a great
>> idea on certain routes, IMHO.
>
> Absolutely. It can have the added benefit of kids having each other
> to amuse themselves during long flights. Maybe airlines could call it
> *kiddy priority seating section" and make them feel very important.

Truth in advertiing. They could call it the 7th Circle of Hell.

--
ant
Don't try to reply to my email addy:
I'm borrowing that of the latest
scammer/spammer


From: DevilsPGD on
In message <5grhv4F3hmasfU1(a)mid.individual.net> "ant"
<lotto_officialmail(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

>hummingbird wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 14:13:22 GMT 'Jeff Hacker'
>> posted this onto rec.travel.air:
>
>>> Years ago, Eastern Air Lines had a "family" section on their DC8-61's
>>> between JFK and San Juan, with that section in the rear portion of
>>> the jet. I don't know how it worked out, but it would be a great
>>> idea on certain routes, IMHO.
>>
>> Absolutely. It can have the added benefit of kids having each other
>> to amuse themselves during long flights. Maybe airlines could call it
>> *kiddy priority seating section" and make them feel very important.
>
>Truth in advertiing. They could call it the 7th Circle of Hell.

Or an incentive to show up on time -- Anyone arriving late to the gate
would have their seat reassigned.

--
If quitters never win, and winners never quit,
what fool came up with, "Quit while you're ahead"?