From: Gregory Morrow on

Robert Cohen wrote:

> other reasonable reasons for kicking damnee baby off the plane:
>
> 10. great film starring vin diesel or bruce willis or chuck norris
> while annoying baby keeps repeating "tell-tubb"
> 9. baby-carrier and seat belt are mutually exclusive
> 8. to prevent melt-down by stewardess
> 7. baby pisssed the way they're throwing our luggage down-there
> 6. imitation by the captain of a reassuring actor is grade b ham
> 5. baby needs more radiation from detector-wand
> 4. what would messiah do if placed in a sardine tin?
> 3. baby oughta stay 'n see beautifiul houston waterfront
> 2. it's a longggg trip from texas to oklahoma with an obnoxious baby
> 1. to divert atttention from that near (10 yards) disaster at orlando
>


Lol...all too true.

--
Best
Greg

"I am smarter than you think I am"
- Maryanne "Loafhead" Kehoe to me
in alt.gossip.celebrities


From: Hatunen on
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:06:38 -0000, Jim Davis
<sky.dancer1(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Jul 13, 12:31 am, NotABushSupporter <u...(a)not.here> wrote:
>> Brian wrote:

>> So what is the problem that existed on this flight and not on all of the
>> other flights this FA has flown. I suspect we don't have the whole story..- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>IMHO, I don't think we'll know the right story until one of the PAX
>speaks up. (If at all)

Apparently the lady and her little girl were on the ABC Morning
Show, and the little girl proceeded to act like a real brat on
camera, scattering the interviewer's table full of papers and
yelling and all, and had to be escorted backstage so her mother
could talk. If the lady tries to sue the airline I would expect
the video will end up as defendant's evidence.

--
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen(a)cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
From: Brian on
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 11:48:35 -0700, Scott en Aztlán
<scottenaztlan(a)yahoo.com> wrote:


>Until then, if your kids are too young/too undisciplined to behave
>properly in public, then you need to take private transportation or
>simply keep them at home.

Or if the mere babbling of a child bothers you that much, maybe you
should be the one to take private transportation.

From: DaveM on
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 15:03:57 -0700, Hatunen <hatunen(a)cox.net> wrote:

>On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 00:06:38 -0000, Jim Davis
><sky.dancer1(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 13, 12:31 am, NotABushSupporter <u...(a)not.here> wrote:
>>> Brian wrote:
>
>>> So what is the problem that existed on this flight and not on all of the
>>> other flights this FA has flown. I suspect we don't have the whole story..- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>IMHO, I don't think we'll know the right story until one of the PAX
>>speaks up. (If at all)
>
>Apparently the lady and her little girl were on the ABC Morning
>Show, and the little girl proceeded to act like a real brat on
>camera, scattering the interviewer's table full of papers and
>yelling and all, and had to be escorted backstage so her mother
>could talk. If the lady tries to sue the airline I would expect
>the video will end up as defendant's evidence.

I don't see how. Firstly, it was the mother's alleged behaviour, not the
child's that had them removed from the plane. Secondly, it was her son, not
a little girl, and thirdly the fact that a toddler can behave like a toddler
is hardly news; it's not as if anyone has accused the toddler of running
around out-of-control on the plane.

DaveM
From: MarcoPoloPlayer on
jason.king(a)bluebottle.com wrote:
> On 14 Jul, 07:18, NotABushSupporter <u...(a)not.here> wrote:
>
>>Scott wrote:
>>
>>>Agent_C spake thusly on 241271232 ::
>
>
>>You don't really know what the child was doing.
>>You only know what one news report said.
>
>
> Yet you managed to agree totally with the FA and applaud their
> actions. Do you know something we do not about this incident?
>
>

Where did I say I totally agreed and appauded her actions?