From: Ari Silverstein on
On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:19:41 -0500, Terry J. Wood wrote:

> Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:8946c4Fj9cU1
> @mid.individual.net:
>
>> I know of no textile, clothing cruises where you would be put to port
>> for a simple sexual solicitation. Why the overkill?
>
> You'd have to ask them to know for sure.
>
> But I get the feeling they've had this problem arise in the past and have
> found a sure fire way to deal with it.

Nope, not unless the solicitations are frequent and harassing. Then
there might be a case that security would step in. I can't ever
remember that _without warning_, security has ported even a harassing
passenger.

Cruise lines don't like bad publicity and attempt if at all possible
to keep problems handled internally. They would be more likely to lock
you in your room or in the ship's brig than to port you.
--
Ari Silverstein, C.T.A; C.T.A.S, FREE Cruise Travel Advisory Services
www.cruisequick.com - able to offer some of the lowest prices and best
value added in the industry. (not affiliated)
From: Terry J. Wood on
Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:894abaFcatU1
@mid.individual.net:

> Cruise lines don't like bad publicity and attempt if at all possible
> to keep problems handled internally. They would be more likely to lock
> you in your room or in the ship's brig than to port you.

Let us know how it goes! At least you'll fare better than GWB:

http://www.cartoonstock.com/newscartoons/cartoonists/lal/lowres/laln436l.jpg
From: Dan Abel on
In article <8946c4Fj9cU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 13:19:11 -0500, Terry J. Wood wrote:
>
> > Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:893ttmFulcU1
> > @mid.individual.net:
> >
> >> Many of the clothing-optional cruises are also "swinger" cruises where
> >> private party rooms are used as do-whatever-sexually.
> >
> > I couldn't tell you about that. The only cruises I know are the Bare
> > Necessities cruises and they are rather clear about what they expect:
> >
> > http://www.bare-necessities.com/decorum.html
>
> "Bare Necessities also complies with the cruise line�s regulations,
> which we agreed to when we entered into the charter agreement,
> including the right to dismiss persons from the cruise for abusing
> alcohol and/or drugs, sexual solicitation..."
>
> I know of no textile, clothing cruises where you would be put to port
> for a simple sexual solicitation. Why the overkill?

Because it has been found necessary? I'm just guessing, but I wouldn't
be surprised if some folks are concerned about being made uncomfortable,
and enough have asked, that rules have been made to ensure the comfort
of the passengers.

Keep in mind, that both for this, and for other questions that you have
asked, if nobody complains, no action will be taken.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
dabel(a)sonic.net
From: Dan Abel on
In article <894abaFcatU1(a)mid.individual.net>,
Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:19:41 -0500, Terry J. Wood wrote:
>
> > Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:8946c4Fj9cU1
> > @mid.individual.net:
> >
> >> I know of no textile, clothing cruises where you would be put to port
> >> for a simple sexual solicitation. Why the overkill?
> >
> > You'd have to ask them to know for sure.
> >
> > But I get the feeling they've had this problem arise in the past and have
> > found a sure fire way to deal with it.
>
> Nope, not unless the solicitations are frequent and harassing. Then
> there might be a case that security would step in. I can't ever
> remember that _without warning_, security has ported even a harassing
> passenger.
>
> Cruise lines don't like bad publicity and attempt if at all possible
> to keep problems handled internally. They would be more likely to lock
> you in your room or in the ship's brig than to port you.

I'll remind you that, according to the cite, these are the rules of the
cruise line, not the charter agency:

http://www.bare-necessities.com/decorum.html

As such, the Captain is enforcing the rules of his/her employer. If the
captains don't get all weird and arbitrary on non-nude cruises, they
shouldn't behave differently on nude cruises.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
dabel(a)sonic.net
From: Terry J. Wood on
Ari Silverstein <AriSilverstein(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:896lpkFi51U1
@mid.individual.net:

> My take is this is a true statement as long as there is no other
> sexual stimulation. This is where I find the problem.

There IS another way. But it involves tasers. That's why we discuss tasters
in rec.nude all the time! :-)

Terry "How Shocking!" Wood
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: CruiseQuick.com Update
Next: One of My Favorite Things