From: James A. Donald on
"Anarcissie":
> Yes, that's the question. Why is it so important?

Because there is no stopping point, no possibility of
compromise. Every concession has been met by demands
for further concessions, and the net effect of all these
concessions is starting to seriously inconvenience,
aggravate and offend. We thought we had a deal, the deal
being to hide away anything with the slightest religious
connotation, and we followed that deal, and it turns out
we do not have a deal. Where do we go from here?

Maybe we need to build a big separation wall, with those
who cannot stand Christmas on one side of the wall and
those who want to celebrate Christmas on the other, and
then ethnically cleanse whoever is on the wrong side of
the wall. :-)

--
----------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.

http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald
From: Arturo Magidin on
In article <1166124589.018088.181400(a)16g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>,
<markzoom(a)digiverse.net> wrote:
>
>Arturo Magidin wrote:

>> >So you wouldn't mind an 8' swastika, a symbol used in various current
>> >and recognised religions, either then?
>>
>> The nazi swastika is different from the symbol in eastern religions;
>> the fold goes the other way.
>
>Who said anything about the nazi swastika?

Fair enough. As I understand it, "swastika" refers to the nazi
symbol; the hindu symbol is called "shubthika" (good symbol).


>> >Many of those that know a Menorah is the official emblem of the Israeli
>> >government would see it as a symbol of another invasion of territory.
>>
>> The Hanukyah (Hanukah-menorah) is different from the Menorah in the
>> national emblem. Much like the star of David is different from the wiccan 5
>> pointed star.
>>
>> The Menorah in the national emblem is a seven-branched
>> candelabrum. The Hanukyah, by contrast, is a nine-branched
>> candelabrum.
>
>A minor detail.

Hardly a minor detail. Just like only the official emblem of the
american government must be a bald eagle, not just any kind of eagle,
so the national emblem of Israel must be a seven branched
candelabrum; a Hanukyah ->must<- be a nine branched candelabrum. Quite
simply, they are not the same thing. Just like the wiccan star and the
Star of David are not the same thing.

If you want to object to a Hanukyah display on some other grounds, go
ahead; we can deal with those. But claiming that it is "the official
emblem of the israeli government" is, quite simply, false.

--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================

Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org

From: Arturo Magidin on
In article <1166124904.436392.294780(a)f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
<markzoom(a)digiverse.net> wrote:
>
>Arturo Magidin wrote:
>> markzoom(a)digiverse.net wrote:
>> > Mark K. Bilbo wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2006 22:02:49 -0800, Laura Sanchez wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >> Too bad Christianity doesn't return the favor.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Excuse me? It's Christians that are the only ones defending Israel and
>> > > > denouncing anti-Semitism.
>> > >
>> > > By refusing to add a menorah to the airport display?
>> >
>> > It's not just some kind of festive decoration.
>> > The menorah is the NATIONAL EMBLEM OF THE "STATE" OF ISRAEL Like the
>> > eagle is to the US!:
>> >
>> > http://www.science.co.il/Israel-Emblem.asp
>>
>> You are confused.
>>
>> The Menorah, the symbol that appears in the official seal of the state
>> of Israel, is a seven-arm candelabra; the Hanukiyah, the "Hanuka
>> menorah" has a different number of arms. They are different emblems,
>> just like the Star of David is different from the Wiccan five-pointed
>> star.
>
>A minor detail, just like people will first think "nazi" when they see
>a swastika, no matter which way round it is.

If that is your "argument" with regards to this, then you have just
shot yourself in the foot.

The vast majority of americans identify the candelabrum (7- or
9-branched) with Hanukah, not with the state of Israel. They call both
"menorah" (the former correclty, the latter incorrectly), and usually
misidentify a 7 branched candelabrum as a Hanukyah and think
"Hanukah". Few are aware of the difference, and the overwhelming
association is that of the holiday, not the political association
(exactly the opposite of the shubhtika, where most people will
misidentify it as political rather than religious). In any case, you
claimed that the 9-branch candelabrum ->is<- the "national emblem of
the "State" of Israel". And that is, quite simply, false. Explain it
away all you want now, you were still wrong.

--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================

Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org

From: Constantinople on

James A. Donald wrote:
> "Anarcissie":
> > Yes, that's the question. Why is it so important?
>
> Because there is no stopping point, no possibility of
> compromise. Every concession has been met by demands
> for further concessions, and the net effect of all these
> concessions is starting to seriously inconvenience,
> aggravate and offend. We thought we had a deal, the deal
> being to hide away anything with the slightest religious
> connotation, and we followed that deal, and it turns out
> we do not have a deal. Where do we go from here?
>
> Maybe we need to build a big separation wall, with those
> who cannot stand Christmas on one side of the wall and
> those who want to celebrate Christmas on the other, and
> then ethnically cleanse whoever is on the wrong side of
> the wall. :-)

As I understand it, Christmas is the winter solstice holiday (possibly
a merging of various winter solstice holidays, for example Yule) and
predates Christianity, is in fact prehistoric in origin. Christians
merely borrowed it for a while. Thus, not only is Christmas not now
exclusively Christian, it never was exclusively Christian. The point
has been raised - a valid point - that Christ was not actually born at
Christmas. That disparity is explained by the fact that the holiday
which we call Christmas predates and was borrowed by Christianity. The
holiday contains some symbols of Christian origin but also some symbols
of pre-Christian origin. Just as, every Christmas, we sing and hear
sung songs of varying ages, some of them recent, others older, others
very old, so have other traditions accrued around the day, some of them
Christian, some of them pre-Christian, some of them post-Christian.

Christmas is the product of cultural evolution. Every Christmas new
songs are concocted, but only the best stick, only the best are
repeated, and what we hear every Christmas, the songs of varying ages,
are the best songs, the surviving songs. Thus Christmas is a repository
of cultural accretions going back centuries, a repository that has been
selected and improved over time, sloughing off the inferior candidates
and keeping the superior candidates, which become part of the
traditions.

From: James A. Donald on
dsharavii(a)hotmail.com:
> > > > Better still -- buy a one-way trip to Saudi
> > > > Arabia. There are NO Xmas trees in their
> > > > airports -- or anywhere else.

"Anarcissie"
> > > I have been told otherwise.

James A. Donald
> > Googling for Saudi persecution of Christians, the
> > first hit tells me:
> > : : At least eight other Filipinos arrested
> > : : in the police crackdown on suspected
> > : : Christian worshippers have reportedly
> > : : been transferred out of detention cells,
> > : : in preparation for their imminent
> > : : deportation later this week.
> >
> > The next hit tells me:
> > : : Islam is the official religion of the
> > : : Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and all citizens
> > : : must be Muslims. The Government prohibits
> > : : the public practice of other religions.

"Anarcissie"
> I'm just reporting what I've been told.

Yes, the wisdom of the tribe, one commie tells another
what he wishes was true, and the second commie tells it
back to the first commie, and after it has gone the
circle three times, they start to believe it.

Similarly with commie citations, the infamous trail of
breadcrumbs citation. One commie reports that a bunch
of businessmen came together to support Hitler, and
cites some learned commie scholar, who as evidence for
the truth of it, cites another learned commie scholar,
who in turn ...

--
----------------------
We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because
of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this
right, not from the arbitrary power of the omnipotent state.

http://www.jim.com/ James A. Donald